A briefing by Guy Millière
He has received many death threats for his stand. He is able to discuss the changes of Islam and Political Correctness in France over the last 25 years. Similar themes that I have noted elsewhere are repeated in this talk. I think he has a lot to contribute.
To be honest, what he says is very, very disturbing. Is this our future?
Below is a summary of his talk.
Summary account by Middle East Forum intern Joshua Buri
In a May 24 talk in Philadelphia hosted by the Middle East Forum, noted professor and anti-Islamist author Guy Millière warned that Islamism has spread throughout Europe and argued that this process will likely continue unabated. Daniel Pipes followed with a brief rebuttal, arguing that growing opposition to Islamism offers much hope for a solution.
France, Millière explained, has undergone drastic changes in the past several decades. Prior to the Foulard Affair (1989), there were very few radical Islamic movements in France. Those groups that did exist had limited adherents.
In contrast, there is now a significant radical Muslim movement in France, the main being the UOIF (Union of Islamic Organizations of France). Both UOIF and its parent organization, FIOE (Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe), have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Despite these ties, 50,000 people traveled to Paris to attend the UOIF's annual meeting. At the meeting, attendees listened to radical speakers, some of whom spoke via video as they are banned in France.
Guy Millière is also concerned by the creation of "no-go zones." There are some 718 of these "sensitive urban zones," as the French government terms them, in mainland France. These areas are symbolic of the failure of immigrants to integrate into European society. These zones are especially problematic for police and other city/government employees, who have been met with hostility.
Europe is not currently equipped to deal with the number of people returning from the Middle East with radical beliefs and training. Upon returning to France, suspected jihadists are only monitored for 6 months. This leaves them able to resume their activities without the government's knowledge, sometimes with deadly consequences. For example, the terrorists that attacked the Bataclan theatre in Paris had trained in Syria and were previously monitored by the French government.
However, it is not necessary for people to go abroad to become radicalized. Millière warns that in France, "jails are schools of jihad" for the 70% of French inmates who are Muslim. Within jails, moderate Muslims are silenced and jihad is presented as a way to atone for past wrongs. So far, attempts to de-radicalize French jails have proven unsuccessful.
Millière believes that these trends are likely to continue, as Muslims will make up an increasingly large portion of French society. While Muslims currently make up only 12% of the general population (8 out of 65 million), they comprise more than 25% of the French population younger than 25.
Throughout Europe, traditional political parties do not represent the anger that some of their citizens feel. The rise of reactionary parties indicates that Millière is not alone in his view that "politicians (are) on the verge of surrender" when it comes to Islamism.
The only political parties that accept people who are concerned with this trend are what Millière classifies as the "extreme right" such as the National Front.
Despite their anger, Millière believes people are reluctant to speak out. "People who are angry are immediately called rightist, fascist, and racist." Furthermore, leftist judges can fine people who are critical of Islam using the French legal system.
Middle East Forum President Daniel Pipes presented a more optimistic view of the future – specifically, the growing opposition in response to the increase in Islamism. He points to Germany's deal with Turkey for guest workers in 1955 as the impetus for the increase in Sharia and Islam in Europe. However, starting around 25 years ago, pushback began in the form of anti-Koran/minaret votes. While Mr. Pipes concedes that some of this countermovement has its origins in what he terms "nasty places," he remains hopeful that the extreme right will evolve into a more moderate and reasonable counterweight.