Spencer refers to Qur'an Sura 5 ayah 33. Let's take a quick look at that. The verse before it, v32, is the one we are quoted incessantly to demonstrate how peaceful Islam is:~
"Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors."
Now go to the next verse and put v32 in context:~
"Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,"
So, not only is the Qur'an in v32 quoting a teaching given to Jews, not Muslims, but v33 explains that anyone who engages in the loosely defined "corruption in the land" is liable to terrible punishments. Contrary to its popular apologetical usage the passage doesn't mean at all that Islam values human life in a similar way to Judaism or Christianity.
It is Pakistan's hudud laws that have led to Asia Bibi's imprisonment awaiting her death sentence for the last 7 years for drinking water from a Muslim's cup. As I have mentioned before, Spencer stipulates it is important not to discount the Hadith, which leads to stoning for adultery as opposed to the Qur'an's punishment of whipping. Stoning is the punishment under Sharia. There is no place in the 21st century for these laws.
Again, Muslims are not the problem. Sharia, including its hudud laws, are the problem.
Four minute video.